Independent California Political Parties

Article by Bobby Scott

? With voter frustration in California at an all time high, citizens have begun to look at what else is out there other than the two mainstream California political parties. An independent California political party can offer something outside of the normal and outside the control of special interest groups. An independent California political party may just be the remedy for this ailing state that is being chocked by gridlock and selective representation. This past November election had several independents run for California Governor. Here are some options out there to consider during the next elections.

? Libertarian Party. The political platform of the Libertarian Party favors minimal government in both business and the private lives of citizens. They promote relatively unregulated markets, support strong civil liberties, and individual property rights. The party is big on fiscal Independent Parties responsibility and never spending more than the state takes in. They are in support of large scale government cut backs including reducing pensions, scaling back social services, and laying off of various types of state workers.

? Green Party. This California political party platform consists of grass roots social change without the involvement of special interests and corporate money. There is a strong commitment to environmental justice. They promote ecologically sound principles when it comes to basic living as well as business development and state infrastructure. Their economic polices focus on decentralized government with an emphasis on community based economic development. The party is a major proponent of renewable energy and the promotion of the new California “Green Economy” where they favor government incentives for such businesses.

? American Independent Party. The party is heavily faith based and believes in constitutional principles Independent Parties and social conservatism. They rally around tight immigration control, rights to bear arms, same sex marriage, pro life policies, and home schooling. Their business policies revolve around building a local manufacturing and production base that will reduce reliance on foreign imports. They feel the average California has been long over taxed and propose major tax reform that will significantly reduce state income tax. They also feel that the California state legislature should function as a part-time entity.

? Peace and Freedom Party. As a California political party that emphasis worker rights, the party supports democratic socialism that offers an economic partnership run by state owned enterprises and private companies. Social justice is heavily tied to work rights and regulation on economic exploitation. They also promote a strong social safety net along with social services through the increase or corporate taxes.

Independent Parties

We need an Independent Party!

Article by Jim DeSantis

The election is over. The call, by some Democrat leaders, to get out of Iraq within a few months has already begun. The political jockeying for advantage in the next election is underway. The effort to corner President Bush was hinted at within days after the election results were in. Nancy Pelosi reminded us – “He’s the President of the United States. I respect the office. It’s his call.” She, of course, was talking about Iraq. In other words, Bush, and Republicans, will be set up to take the blame if we are not out of Iraq soon.

Here is how this will play out and why we, as voters, need to make every politician accountable in 2008.

The Democrats will propose a plan to get out of Iraq that President Bush will not accept. It will be based upon recommendations from the Independent Study Commission, a commission endorsed by President Bush. Democrats will try to force the President into a veto, a veto that Democrats do not have enough votes to over-ride. Thus, the President and the GOP will be to blame going into 2008 elections.

Democrats will continue to vote in favor of funds to continue the war in Iraq because they “support the troops but not the war”. Many Republicans will vote with them based on that mantra.

Democrats will propose a national hike in the minimum wage, taking Independent Parties away State’s Rights, trying to force another veto by the President.

Democrats will propose a change in tax law, punishing the so-called “rich” in favor of the so-called “middle class” in spite of the fact that the richest people pay 85% of the Federal Income Tax income that goes into the Federal Budget. “Take from the rich and give to the middle class” will be the Democrat mantra. This likely will be vetoed by the President as well. This is a twist on the John Edwards mantra.

Democrats will propose to strip big oil of federal tax breaks. This could pass and could be the one veto that is overridden because most Americans believe we are being gouged at the gas pumps. Of course, this ignores the need for big oil to invest in finding new sources of oil and building greater refinery capacity. One needs to be a CPA to figure this one out so Democrats will simply play to the emotional triggers in each of us.

Democrats will propose a rewrite of the Prescription Drug legislation that brought much cheaper drugs to Seniors. They will attempt to impose a “negotiation clause”, that is, negotiate with the Pharms over the cost of drugs. Sounds good. Plays to our emotions and personal budgets. Fact is, short of price controls, which never work (remember Nixon?), the Pharms are giving the current discounts voluntarily.

My list is getting too Independent Parties long, isn’t it? You already have figured out much of this, haven’t you? Am I a Republican? Democrat? Independent? My answer is – I am a voter. I vote on a candidate-by-candidate basis, regardless of party affiliation.

Election 2006 was about voter disenchantment with Congress. For me, and a huge majority of Americans, Election 2006 was not just about Iraq or Immigration or Energy, etc. Pollsters, across the board, in every poll, found that Congress had a less-than-30% approval rating. This is 10-to-15 points below the President’s rating.

Where did this leave us? As pointed out in my previous post, we had to choose between the “Lesser of Two Evils”. It’s unfortunate that the political process is rigged to favor two political parties.

We need an Independent Party of equal power in both Primary and General Elections. Perhaps, as Joe Lieberman proved, a person with a true desire to be a “public servant” can be elected as an Independent candidate.

I am hopeful that young voters reading this will be energized into action and help form a true Independent Party. That they will bring about a change in our antiquated political process. That they will weed out the “politicians” and elect “public servants” in the future. That some of them will persue a career in government or politics to create a government that is truly – “by the people and for the people” as our Constitution Independent Parties promises.

Astrology & The 2008 US Presidential Election – 1952 Deja Vu?

There is a spiritual hunger in the world today – and it cannot be satisfied by better cars on longer credit terms. – Adlai E. Stevenson (1952 / Democratic Presidential Candidate)

I despise people who go to the gutter on either the right or the left and hurl rocks at those in the center.

- Dwight D. Eisenhower (1952 / Republican Presidential Candidate)

Can you imagine Barack Obama uttering the first quote? What about John McCain as the deliverer of the second? Neither is a stretch, is it?

A recent business event at which gifted political pundits Tucker Carlson and James Carville squared off for some lively chat about the upcoming election brought this thought to light. It was Carville, a Hillary supporter who now puts her prospects of becoming the Democratic nominee as akin to drawing to a 16 in blackjack, who noted that an Obama – McCain duel resonates with nothing so much as the Stevenson vs.

Eisenhower election of 1952. Certainly there are some mammoth differences—most significantly, at the earlier election the Democrats had controlled the presidency for two straight decades—but one gets the gist of Carville’s observation in the elevated populism of the highly educated Obama and the iconoclastic centrist tendencies of former military-man McCain.

True political history fans will note a number of nifty in-fighting parallels in the respective nomination processes of Stevenson/Obama and Eisenhower/McCain, but there are certainly far more compelling cultural kinship ties between 1952 and 2008. One can see the correspondences in the entropic drag of unpopular ideology-driven wars (Korea, Iraq) and in the bullying domination of ‘right-thinking’ political forces (McCarthyism, The Patriot Act). And surely the bogeyman of terrorist attack that is paraded before us on a daily basis today US Presidential election is somewhat resonant with America’s first test detonation of a hydrogen bomb, 30 more times more powerful than the Hiroshima A-bomb, in November of 1952.

Quite thrillingly (if one is an astrologer) the strongest cosmic tie between the two years is to be found in the identical placement of the nodes of the moon. Now as much as I’d like to get all astro-pedantic here, suffice it to say that the moon’s nodes, which astronomically have to do with orbital inclination and intersection, are an essential calculation in any horoscope cast by a reputable astrologer. These extremely powerful points are said to deal with evolutionary direction, from the south node (where we have been, what we know, and where we are most comfortable) to the north node (where we must go, what we must learn, and where we are challenged to grow).

Right now, as in 1952, the nodes are suggesting that mankind is confronted with a choice on a path between a south node Leo foundation and a north node Aquarian destiny. Without intending this to sound judgmental, one may think of Leo as representing every human endeavor that grants preeminence to personal predilection and self-satisfaction. Aquarius, the diametric opposite of Leo, is emblematic of selfless social consideration and preeminence granted to the requirements of the collective.

Now it has rarely been a smart bet to push all of one’s chips onto the self-sacrificing community-mindedness square of the humanity craps table. This is especially true at an astro-historical moment that emphasizes how familiar and comfortable (south node) it feels for humanity to be selfish. When one factors in the sheer anxiety of the times, how can anyone be blamed for worrying about numero uno?

The answer in 1952 US Presidential election was, of course, to go on a frenzy of production and consumption and baby making…and to elect as president a retired general who history suggests would rather golf than govern (although some historians celebrate the generally laissez-faire Eisenhower for not breaking anything, including the peace). It is now fashionable to disparage the values formed with the advent of Ike’s election as selfish but, dammit, everybody was war-weary, anxious, and ready for the pay-off promised by victory in WWII – The Big One. It was about time for life to provide a nice car, and a decent payment schedule, and an interstate highway system to facilitate suburban living and personal adventure.

So where do we go this time around? Does a less promising environment for economic growth force our hands? Do we have to become socially-concerned citizens because we’ve run out of stuff…or maybe even the desire for stuff? Is social concern where we have to go inevitably, whether we want to go there or not?

Now a truly wise person might suggest that the issue of the nodes is not a case of either/or but, rather, one of both. May we not simultaneously be wise stewards of our personal desires and our social obligations? Is the hybrid car a sort of religious object?

Anyway, the suggestion here is that McGovern may be best understood as a symbolic step back towards Leo, and that Obama may be a symbolic step towards Aquarius. But don’t count out Hillary just yet. As Tucker Carlson was prepared to concede, “Hillary Clinton is the toughest person who has ever lived…she’s been attacked for everything since 1978 and she’s still a game fighter who expects to win.”

What else would you expect from a Scorpio?

US Presidential election

Three Ways to Create Political Reform in California

Article by Bobby Scott

It is no secret that California is ailing. What is needed is a California political reform act for 2011 and beyond. The state is mired in a roughly $ 10 billion budget deficit which as recently as January was at a staggering $ 26 billion. Through a round of budget cuts and tax increases fueled by the budget vote reform of proposition 25, lawmakers have significantly reduced the state deficit. However, $ 10 billion is still a serious amount of money and can potentially drag the state into further deficit spending. Infrastructure is falling apart and California’s position as a premier destination for the world’s best and brightest is now threatened.To get California back in the black there has to be further political reform and the appetite for political change has to grow. The Political Reforms status quo has clearly failed the state. Change must be mandated now. Below are three suggestions to help get the state get back on track. Hopefully these policies can serve as the basis of a new California political reform act for the future.

1. Extend Gubernatorial Term Limits: Reform has to start at the top. State politics and policy making is a complex and arduous process to say the least. When the impact of the average piece of legislation is not felt for at least seven years, it makes sense for the leadership to not only see legislation through but also adjust and fortify it. Two terms is just not enough to make lasting generational change.

2. Moratorium on State Payroll Tax for New Businesses: Impose a two year moratorium on state payroll tax for newly started businesses. The employers Political Reforms of the majority of people not just in California, but in the United States as well are small businesses. The state corporate tax structure has long needed reform, however an initiative such as this is not overly complex to implement, but has tremendous potential to spur new job growth. And this growth can likely help California solidify new economy industries such as biotechnology and green tech.

3. Maintain Multi Year Budgets: Budget reform has been a hot topic in California. The process itself is very political and usually leaves both major parties with a bad taste in their mouth. Instead of making this a yearly roll in the mud, have budgets that last for two or three years at a time. This will alleviate yearly gridlock and gimmicky “flavor of the month” policies. Budgetary policies are marathons, not sprints!

Political Reforms

The 2008 Presidential Election

It is 2008 and that means its Election Year. This is the 56th consecutive presidential election and a very peculiar one as the Democratic political party has elected the first woman to run for president, Mrs. Hillary Clinton, whom was former US First Lady. The Democratic party has aslo elected the first African American whom is the former Illinois State Senator, Barack Obama. It is a “Battle of the Firsts” for the Democratic party in 2008.

Hilary Clinton

At age 60, Hilary Clinton is a representative for the democratic party. She was born in Chicago, IL. She is married to former president Bill Clinton, and they have one daughter, Chelsea Clinton. She attended Wellesley College and obtained a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science in 1969. She then attended Yale University Law School and became Juris Doctor in 1973. In 1973 she was staff attorney for the Children’s Defense Fund.

Then in 1974 she became staff attorney for the presidential impeachment inquiry and House Judiciary Committee. Next, in 1975 she became a faculty member at the University of Arkansas Law School in Fayetteville, Ark. From 1976 to 1979 she was an associate at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Ark. Then in 1979 to 1992 she made partner at the same Rose Law Firm. Prior to being a U.S. senator, from 1993-2001 she was First Lady of the United States.

Barack Presidential election Obama

The democratic candidate Barck Obama has great steam as the election year closes. Obama’s campaign has put him in a good position to be elected. However, republicans are hoping for this and looking at this as an advantage. Why? Well while many people think that Obama’s black skin color is his biggest disadvantage, it is truly at the bottom of the list of his weak points. The republican party is hoping that Obama WILL win the democratic ticket. WHY? Well they feel that this will be a great advantage for them to win the overall election. As part of their strategy, if Obama wins the democratic ticket they will pick Obama apart, therefore minimizing his chances of winning the election as president. They will jump on the bandwagon and criticize Obama about his lack of experience. They will also speak about his support for abortion and stem cell research. Next they will bring light to his objection to the war in Iraq. Finally they will bring in his skin color or the issue of him not being fully American. If Obama won the democratic nomination, the republican party truly feels it will be to their advantage.

Election overall

During the 2008 presidential election the war in Iraq, the immigration bill, social security, health care, and oil prices are just a few of the hot topic issues that Americans are concerned about.